A research grant is funding awarded to support a defined research project, typically to a university, institute or individual investigator, against a proposal setting out aims, methods and budget.
Managing research grants involves structured calls, expert review, milestone-based disbursement and reporting on findings, which is more complex than most general grant programs.
A research grant is funding awarded to support a defined research project, typically to a university, institute or individual investigator, against a proposal setting out the project's aims, methods and budget. It funds the pursuit of knowledge rather than service delivery.
Research grants add layers most grant programs do not have: a public call for proposals, expert peer review of scientific merit, a named principal investigator accountable for the work, milestone-based disbursement, and reporting on research outputs. This makes them more complex to run.
A funder issues a call for proposals, applicants submit detailed proposals (sometimes via a letter of intent first), independent experts assess them through peer review, funds are released against milestones, and the grantee reports on outputs and, often, ethics compliance.
Universities, research institutes and individual investigators are the typical recipients. On the funder side, research grants are run by public agencies, research councils, corporate and private foundations, and universities funding internal or external research.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
Blind review is the practice of assessing applications with identifying details withheld from reviewers — applicant name, organisation, and often location — so that scores reflect the proposal rather than its author's reputation.
Blind review reduces one kind of bias and cannot remove all of them. Writing quality, named partners and budget scale often reveal the applicant anyway, which is why funders pair it with a declared conflict-of-interest process rather than relying on it alone.
A scoring rubric is the document that defines what reviewers assess in an application, the scale they use for each criterion, and how much each criterion counts toward the total score.
The rubric is the instrument; scoring is the act of using it. Publishing it with the call lets applicants address the criteria directly, and keeping it on file lets a funder explain a decision months after it was made.
A request for proposals (RFP) is a document a funder issues to invite applications for funding. It sets out what is available, who is eligible, how proposals will be evaluated, the required format, and the deadline.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)