Peer Review
Peer review is the evaluation of research proposals by independent experts in the relevant field, who assess scientific merit, feasibility and value to determine which projects should be funded.
Coordinating reviewers, managing conflicts of interest and consolidating scores fairly are central to a credible research-funding process.
Related terms
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
Research Output
Research outputs are the tangible results a funded project produces, such as publications, datasets, patents or tools, and are a primary measure of a grant's return.
Capturing outputs against each grant lets a funder demonstrate the knowledge and value its funding generated, well beyond simply tracking how money was spent.
Ethics Approval
Ethics approval is formal confirmation, usually from an ethics committee or institutional review board, that a research project meets accepted standards for the treatment of participants, data and welfare.
Funders often require evidence of ethics approval before releasing funds, making it a checkpoint that grant management needs to record and verify.
Call for Proposals
A call for proposals is a funder's public invitation to submit applications for a defined funding opportunity, stating the theme, eligibility, budget and deadline.
A well-structured call, with clear criteria and an online submission process, attracts relevant applications and makes the subsequent review fair and efficient.
Want to see how this dashboard works?
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
