Research outputs are the tangible results a funded project produces, such as publications, datasets, patents or tools, and are a primary measure of a grant's return.
Capturing outputs against each grant lets a funder demonstrate the knowledge and value its funding generated, well beyond simply tracking how money was spent.
Research outputs are the tangible products a funded project generates: peer-reviewed publications, datasets, software, patents, prototypes and conference presentations. They are the concrete results a funder can point to as having come from the grant.
Outputs are what a project produces, papers, datasets, patents. Outcomes and impact are the change those outputs go on to create, new treatments, policy shifts, further discoveries. Outputs are countable and near-term; impact is broader and unfolds over years.
Because outputs are the most direct, verifiable evidence that a grant produced something. They are easier to capture and attribute than long-term impact, which makes them the practical basis for a funder's reporting on what its funding achieved.
By recording outputs against each grant as they appear, publications, datasets, patents, so a funder builds a verifiable record over time rather than reconstructing it at the end. This supports reporting and helps trace which funding led to which results.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
Ethics approval is formal confirmation, usually from an ethics committee or institutional review board, that a research project meets accepted standards for the treatment of participants, data and welfare.
Funders often require evidence of ethics approval before releasing funds, making it a checkpoint that grant management needs to record and verify.
A call for proposals is a funder's public invitation to submit applications for a defined funding opportunity, stating the theme, eligibility, budget and deadline.
A well-structured call, with clear criteria and an online submission process, attracts relevant applications and makes the subsequent review fair and efficient.
Indirect costs, or overhead, are the expenses that support research without being tied to a single project, such as facilities, administration and utilities, usually funded as a percentage of direct costs.
How a funder treats indirect costs materially affects a grant's real value, so the rate and rules need to be defined clearly in the program's terms.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)