Grantee reporting is how funders learn what their money achieved. Instead of free-text emails and ad-hoc PDFs, structured report forms, sent on a schedule, return comparable data on activities, outputs and outcomes.
This is the raw material for impact measurement. Without consistent grantee reporting, a funder can show what it spent, but not what changed.
Grantee reporting is how funders learn what their money achieved. After funds are disbursed, grantees report back on activities, spending and results, giving the funder the data it needs to judge whether a grant delivered on its purpose.
Free-text emails and ad-hoc PDFs arrive in different shapes and cannot be compared across a portfolio. Structured forms sent on a schedule return comparable data on activities, outputs and outcomes, so results can be rolled up across a whole program.
Grantee reporting is the raw material for impact measurement. The quality of a funder's impact data depends on how structured and consistent the reporting is, because outcomes that were not collected in a comparable form cannot later be measured.
Under frameworks like the CSRD, funders increasingly need verifiable, auditable data on the social results of their programs. That evidence has to come from grantees in a structured form that can be aggregated and stand up to audit.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
The value of volunteer time is an hourly monetary rate applied to volunteer hours in order to express a volunteering programme's contribution in currency terms, used in impact reports and in-kind accounting.
The figure is an estimate, not a payment. It states what those hours would have cost to buy, which makes programmes comparable over time — and says nothing about what the receiving organisation actually gained.
Post-award is the phase of the grant lifecycle that follows the funding decision: disbursing funds, tracking how they are spent, collecting grantee reports, measuring outcomes against the objectives set at the start, and closing the grant.
Post-award is where impact is either evidenced or lost. A funder whose attention stops at the payment has spent the money without being able to say what it produced.
Expenditure responsibility is the set of steps a US private foundation must take when it grants to an organisation that is not a public charity: a pre-grant inquiry, a written agreement restricting the use of funds, separate accounting by the grantee, reports on how the money was spent, and disclosure on the foundation's own return.
The obligation follows the money, not the recipient's good faith. Omitting a step is a compliance failure even where the funds achieved exactly what both parties intended.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)