Impact measurement moves reporting beyond outputs (grants awarded, euros spent) to outcomes (people supported, conditions improved).
It relies on defining what success looks like up front, often via a theory of change and a small set of KPIs, and on collecting data from grantees throughout. Robust impact measurement is increasingly required for CSR reporting under frameworks like CSRD and ESRS.
Impact measurement is the process of assessing the change a funded program produces, moving beyond outputs (what was delivered) to outcomes (what actually changed for people). It relies on defining success upfront and collecting evidence throughout the grant.
Measurement is the process of collecting and assessing evidence of change. Reporting is the presentation of those findings to an audience. You measure first, then report; strong reporting is only possible on the back of consistent measurement.
By defining what success looks like before funding starts, usually through a theory of change and a focused set of KPIs, then collecting data from grantees throughout the grant rather than only at the end. This makes outcomes measurable rather than anecdotal.
Increasingly, yes. Frameworks like the CSRD require companies to report auditable social-impact data, so robust measurement is shifting from good practice to a compliance expectation for corporate funders and foundations.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
The value of volunteer time is an hourly monetary rate applied to volunteer hours in order to express a volunteering programme's contribution in currency terms, used in impact reports and in-kind accounting.
The figure is an estimate, not a payment. It states what those hours would have cost to buy, which makes programmes comparable over time — and says nothing about what the receiving organisation actually gained.
Post-award is the phase of the grant lifecycle that follows the funding decision: disbursing funds, tracking how they are spent, collecting grantee reports, measuring outcomes against the objectives set at the start, and closing the grant.
Post-award is where impact is either evidenced or lost. A funder whose attention stops at the payment has spent the money without being able to say what it produced.
Outputs are the immediate, countable products of a program, such as grants made, people trained or euros spent, while outcomes are the changes that result, such as improved conditions or lasting benefit.
Mature impact measurement reports both, but treats outcomes as the real test of whether funding achieved its purpose rather than was simply delivered.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)