Impact measurement moves reporting beyond outputs (grants awarded, euros spent) to outcomes (people supported, conditions improved).
It relies on defining what success looks like up front, often via a theory of change and a small set of KPIs, and on collecting data from grantees throughout. Robust impact measurement is increasingly required for CSR reporting under frameworks like CSRD and ESRS.
Impact measurement is the process of assessing the change a funded program produces, moving beyond outputs (what was delivered) to outcomes (what actually changed for people). It relies on defining success upfront and collecting evidence throughout the grant.
Measurement is the process of collecting and assessing evidence of change. Reporting is the presentation of those findings to an audience. You measure first, then report; strong reporting is only possible on the back of consistent measurement.
By defining what success looks like before funding starts, usually through a theory of change and a focused set of KPIs, then collecting data from grantees throughout the grant rather than only at the end. This makes outcomes measurable rather than anecdotal.
Increasingly, yes. Frameworks like the CSRD require companies to report auditable social-impact data, so robust measurement is shifting from good practice to a compliance expectation for corporate funders and foundations.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
A project grant is funding awarded for a specific, defined piece of work, with its own objectives, timeline and budget, rather than for the general running of the organisation receiving it.
It is the most common form of grant. The funder approves a described project and expects to be told what that project achieved, which is why project grants carry heavier reporting requirements than unrestricted funding.
International grantmaking is awarding grants to organisations based outside the funder's own country, which adds verification, currency, language and reporting requirements that domestic grants do not carry.
The additional work is front-loaded. Establishing that a foreign organisation can be funded is harder than paying it, and the route chosen at the outset determines the obligations for years afterwards.
Data residency is the country or region where a platform physically stores the data you put into it. It is a contractual commitment, not a technical preference, and a supplier should be able to state it in writing.
For grant, sponsorship and volunteering programmes the data in question includes applicant and employee personal data, which is what moves residency out of the IT conversation and into procurement.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)