A theory of change articulates the logical chain from inputs and activities, through outputs, to outcomes and ultimate impact.
It makes a program's assumptions explicit and defines what should be measured at each step. Funders use it to align grantees around shared goals, and to decide which indicators actually demonstrate impact, rather than measuring whatever is easiest to count.
A theory of change is a funder's articulation of how the grants it makes will produce the outcomes it cares about. It maps the causal path from inputs, through activities and outputs, to outcomes and ultimately impact.
A theory of change is the reasoning: a causal hypothesis about why an intervention should work, including the assumptions behind it. A logframe is the matrix that turns that reasoning into a structured table of indicators and verification.
It answers why a funder believes its grants will produce change, names the intermediate outcomes on the path, and makes explicit the assumptions that must hold. This turns funding from a hopeful bet into a testable strategy.
Yes. Many funders expect grantees to have a theory of change, or to produce one on request, and use it to design reporting that collects evidence on the model rather than disconnected activity metrics.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
A project grant is funding awarded for a specific, defined piece of work, with its own objectives, timeline and budget, rather than for the general running of the organisation receiving it.
It is the most common form of grant. The funder approves a described project and expects to be told what that project achieved, which is why project grants carry heavier reporting requirements than unrestricted funding.
International grantmaking is awarding grants to organisations based outside the funder's own country, which adds verification, currency, language and reporting requirements that domestic grants do not carry.
The additional work is front-loaded. Establishing that a foreign organisation can be funded is harder than paying it, and the route chosen at the outset determines the obligations for years afterwards.
Data residency is the country or region where a platform physically stores the data you put into it. It is a contractual commitment, not a technical preference, and a supplier should be able to state it in writing.
For grant, sponsorship and volunteering programmes the data in question includes applicant and employee personal data, which is what moves residency out of the IT conversation and into procurement.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)