Trust-based philanthropy is an approach that seeks to rebalance the power between funders and grantees, through multi-year unrestricted funding, lighter reporting and application burdens, and a relationship built on trust rather than control.
Trust-based philanthropy is an approach that rebalances power toward grantees, through multi-year unrestricted funding, lighter application and reporting burdens, and a relationship built on trust rather than control.
Lighter, more conversational reporting; streamlined due diligence; and more unrestricted, multi-year funding, all aimed at reducing the administrative load on grantees so they can focus on the work.
Trust-based philanthropy changes how a funder treats grantees after deciding to fund them. Participatory grantmaking changes who makes the funding decision, sharing it with affected communities. One reforms the relationship, the other the decision.
As a response to a traditional imbalance where funders held most power and grantees spent heavy effort proving themselves. It assumes organisations closest to a problem are best placed to solve it.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
International grantmaking is awarding grants to organisations based outside the funder's own country, which adds verification, currency, language and reporting requirements that domestic grants do not carry.
The additional work is front-loaded. Establishing that a foreign organisation can be funded is harder than paying it, and the route chosen at the outset determines the obligations for years afterwards.
Data residency is the country or region where a platform physically stores the data you put into it. It is a contractual commitment, not a technical preference, and a supplier should be able to state it in writing.
For grant, sponsorship and volunteering programmes the data in question includes applicant and employee personal data, which is what moves residency out of the IT conversation and into procurement.
Post-award is the phase of the grant lifecycle that follows the funding decision: disbursing funds, tracking how they are spent, collecting grantee reports, measuring outcomes against the objectives set at the start, and closing the grant.
Post-award is where impact is either evidenced or lost. A funder whose attention stops at the payment has spent the money without being able to say what it produced.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)