Participatory grantmaking is an approach in which the communities affected by funding help decide how it is allocated. Rather than the funder alone choosing grantees, decision-making power is shared with the people the funding is meant to serve.
Participatory grantmaking is an approach where the communities affected by funding help decide how it is allocated, sharing decision-making power with the people the funding is meant to serve rather than leaving it to the funder alone.
A conventional selection committee is usually the funder's own people or chosen experts. Participatory grantmaking deliberately includes the affected community as decision-makers, changing who holds the power, not just the mechanism.
Participatory grantmaking concerns who makes the funding decision; trust-based philanthropy concerns how grantees are treated afterwards. They are complementary and often combined, but address different stages.
Because people closest to a problem often understand best what will work. Sharing decision power aims to produce better-targeted funding and to correct the imbalance of a distant funder deciding on a community's behalf.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
International grantmaking is awarding grants to organisations based outside the funder's own country, which adds verification, currency, language and reporting requirements that domestic grants do not carry.
The additional work is front-loaded. Establishing that a foreign organisation can be funded is harder than paying it, and the route chosen at the outset determines the obligations for years afterwards.
Data residency is the country or region where a platform physically stores the data you put into it. It is a contractual commitment, not a technical preference, and a supplier should be able to state it in writing.
For grant, sponsorship and volunteering programmes the data in question includes applicant and employee personal data, which is what moves residency out of the IT conversation and into procurement.
Post-award is the phase of the grant lifecycle that follows the funding decision: disbursing funds, tracking how they are spent, collecting grantee reports, measuring outcomes against the objectives set at the start, and closing the grant.
Post-award is where impact is either evidenced or lost. A funder whose attention stops at the payment has spent the money without being able to say what it produced.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)