The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies whenever a grant program collects personal data: applicant names, CVs, financial or sometimes special-category details.
Compliance requires a lawful basis, clear consent, role-based access, defined retention periods, and the ability to delete data on request. Handling this within a GDPR-compliant platform makes these obligations enforceable by design, rather than dependent on manual discipline.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is the EU data-protection law that applies whenever a grant program collects personal data on people in the EU/EEA: applicant names, CVs, financial details and sometimes special-category information. It sets how that data may be collected, used and stored.
Under Article 6, processing needs a lawful basis, most often consent, contractual necessity or legal obligation. A program should identify and document which basis applies before collecting applicant data, rather than assuming consent covers everything.
GDPR governs how a funder handles applicants' personal data (consent, security, retention). Due diligence is the separate act of verifying a grantee's legitimacy. One protects the applicant's data; the other checks the applicant's suitability.
Through data minimisation (collecting only what is needed), role-based access, defined retention periods, and the ability to delete data on request. Handling these inside a compliant platform makes them enforceable by design rather than dependent on manual discipline.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
Data residency is the country or region where a platform physically stores the data you put into it. It is a contractual commitment, not a technical preference, and a supplier should be able to state it in writing.
For grant, sponsorship and volunteering programmes the data in question includes applicant and employee personal data, which is what moves residency out of the IT conversation and into procurement.
Expenditure responsibility is the set of steps a US private foundation must take when it grants to an organisation that is not a public charity: a pre-grant inquiry, a written agreement restricting the use of funds, separate accounting by the grantee, reports on how the money was spent, and disclosure on the foundation's own return.
The obligation follows the money, not the recipient's good faith. Omitting a step is a compliance failure even where the funds achieved exactly what both parties intended.
Equivalency determination is the process by which a US private foundation makes a good-faith determination that a foreign grantee is the equivalent of a US public charity, allowing the grant to be treated like a domestic one.
It is a documentation exercise, not a judgement call. The foundation assembles the grantee's governing documents, financial history and description of activities, and written advice from a qualified tax practitioner supports the conclusion.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)