Fiscal sponsorship is an arrangement where an established tax-exempt organisation receives and administers funds on behalf of a project that lacks its own tax-exempt status, enabling that project to access grants and tax-deductible donations.
Fiscal sponsorship is an arrangement where an established tax-exempt organisation receives and administers funds on behalf of a project that lacks its own tax-exempt status, letting that project access grants and tax-deductible donations.
The sponsor is the legal recipient of the funds and carries the compliance responsibility. It either runs the project directly or re-grants the money to it, depending on the model.
Under fiscal sponsorship, the legal grantee is the sponsor, not the project. A standard grantee holds its own tax-exempt status and receives funds directly. The distinction matters for who a funder is really paying.
The two common models are comprehensive (the project operates inside the sponsor as one of its programs) and the pre-approved grant relationship (the sponsor re-grants funds to a legally separate project).
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
Data residency is the country or region where a platform physically stores the data you put into it. It is a contractual commitment, not a technical preference, and a supplier should be able to state it in writing.
For grant, sponsorship and volunteering programmes the data in question includes applicant and employee personal data, which is what moves residency out of the IT conversation and into procurement.
Expenditure responsibility is the set of steps a US private foundation must take when it grants to an organisation that is not a public charity: a pre-grant inquiry, a written agreement restricting the use of funds, separate accounting by the grantee, reports on how the money was spent, and disclosure on the foundation's own return.
The obligation follows the money, not the recipient's good faith. Omitting a step is a compliance failure even where the funds achieved exactly what both parties intended.
Equivalency determination is the process by which a US private foundation makes a good-faith determination that a foreign grantee is the equivalent of a US public charity, allowing the grant to be treated like a domestic one.
It is a documentation exercise, not a judgement call. The foundation assembles the grantee's governing documents, financial history and description of activities, and written advice from a qualified tax practitioner supports the conclusion.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)