Eligibility criteria are the rules that determine whether an application can proceed to evaluation.
Encoding them into the application form, as automated checks, screens out ineligible requests before they reach reviewers. This saves significant time and ensures applicants are treated consistently. Clear, published criteria also reduce the volume of out-of-scope applications.
Eligibility criteria are the rules that determine whether an application can proceed to evaluation. They act as a yes-or-no gate, covering things like organisation type, geography, funding amounts and required documents, before any assessment of quality.
Eligibility is a filter that removes out-of-scope applications; scoring is a measurement that ranks the applications that passed. Keeping them separate stops reviewers wasting time on requests that could never be funded.
Published criteria let applicants see whether they qualify before applying, so fewer out-of-scope requests enter the system. They also make exclusion decisions transparent and consistent, which supports both fairness and compliance.
Yes. Encoding criteria as automated checks in the application form screens out ineligible requests at the point of entry, before they reach reviewers, so the team only spends time on applications that genuinely qualify.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
Data residency is the country or region where a platform physically stores the data you put into it. It is a contractual commitment, not a technical preference, and a supplier should be able to state it in writing.
For grant, sponsorship and volunteering programmes the data in question includes applicant and employee personal data, which is what moves residency out of the IT conversation and into procurement.
Pre-award is the first phase of the grant lifecycle: publishing the call, receiving applications, checking eligibility, scoring and shortlisting — everything that happens before funds are committed.
Pre-award decides a funder's selectivity. How many ineligible applications reach human reviewers, and how consistently the eligible ones are scored, is settled in this phase and cannot be repaired in the next one.
Expenditure responsibility is the set of steps a US private foundation must take when it grants to an organisation that is not a public charity: a pre-grant inquiry, a written agreement restricting the use of funds, separate accounting by the grantee, reports on how the money was spent, and disclosure on the foundation's own return.
The obligation follows the money, not the recipient's good faith. Omitting a step is a compliance failure even where the funds achieved exactly what both parties intended.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)