Indirect costs, or overhead, are the expenses that support research without being tied to a single project, such as facilities, administration and utilities, usually funded as a percentage of direct costs.
How a funder treats indirect costs materially affects a grant's real value, so the rate and rules need to be defined clearly in the program's terms.
Indirect costs, often called overhead, are the shared expenses of hosting research that cannot be attributed to one project, facilities, administration, utilities. Funders usually cover them as a percentage of a project's direct costs rather than itemising them.
Direct costs are attributable to a specific project, researcher salaries, equipment, materials. Indirect costs are the shared institutional expenses that enable research generally but cannot be traced to one project, so they are recovered as a percentage instead.
Because itemising every shared expense per project would be impractical. Applying an agreed rate, a set percentage of direct costs, gives a simple, consistent way to contribute to overhead. Rates vary widely by funder, from around 15% to 25% or more.
By setting a clear indirect-cost rate in the call and applying it consistently to every budget. A defined policy prevents disputes with institutions and keeps budgets comparable, since everyone calculates overhead the same way.
The newest terms we've added, the words teams managing grants, sponsorship, and CSR come across most often.
Research outputs are the tangible results a funded project produces, such as publications, datasets, patents or tools, and are a primary measure of a grant's return.
Capturing outputs against each grant lets a funder demonstrate the knowledge and value its funding generated, well beyond simply tracking how money was spent.
Ethics approval is formal confirmation, usually from an ethics committee or institutional review board, that a research project meets accepted standards for the treatment of participants, data and welfare.
Funders often require evidence of ethics approval before releasing funds, making it a checkpoint that grant management needs to record and verify.
A call for proposals is a funder's public invitation to submit applications for a defined funding opportunity, stating the theme, eligibility, budget and deadline.
A well-structured call, with clear criteria and an online submission process, attracts relevant applications and makes the subsequent review fair and efficient.
Book a 15-minute demo and we'll show you the exact setup our client uses to track 15+ regional programs.
.png)